Vol. 58 No. 9
September 2006
Allen Howard, President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), NuTech Energy Alliance
Littered throughout the global oil industry are the wells, many of which were extraordinary producers, that ended their life cycles while still leaving 40% or more of the hydrocarbons in the ground. In the industry’s heyday, these production shortfalls were not a major concern because of energy abundance. But as geoscientists actually began seeing a forthcoming end to the seemingly endless supply of oil and gas, finding more bypassed pay became a subject worth exploring. One technology that paid off was nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), which made a quick leap from the medical field to the oil and gas industry in the early 1990s.
Concluding that NMR could be helpful in locating more hydrocarbons, the
immediate challenge became how to best adapt it from its medical roots. At the
outset, in the early days of this technology transfer, the answer focused on
using NMR to measure how much free water and nonmoveable water was in a
reservoir and determining permeability and producibility relationships between
free fluid and permeability. With that knowledge in hand, correct
irreducible-water-saturation resistivity measurements then could identify and
quantify more definitively the amount of hydrocarbons
in place.
But new technology rarely revolutionizes an industry overnight, and this was no exception. Most industries are not necessarily early adopters or effective integrators of change, whether organizationally or technologically, and the oil industry is not unique in this respect. At the same time, there is no doubt that both the upstream and downstream are highly innovative and certainly recognize the power of efficiencies and increased productivity. Locating “bypassed pay” should and does strike a collective corporate nerve.
In NMR’s case, from the early 1990s to the present, an evolution of proprietary software and petrophysical analysis has gradually allowed for more use and better results. Initially, and still the backbone of today’s more refined technology, NMR knowledge was applied to conventional well logs by using bound-fluid-volume and low-resistivity-pay models based on mineralogy, grain size, and pore geometry. Then, advanced modeling was joined with software relationships to produce synthetic magnetic-resonance-imaging logs, all of which could be done with or without magnetic-resonance data.
In other words, software was developed to generate essentially the output produced by a new openhole log. The upshot for operators was that they could virtually eliminate expensive logging and rig time, as well as tool availability issues. Just as important, operators could acquire more definitive data in wells that had already been logged, cased, and completed.
The process of modeling conventional-well-log data with a multimodeling software process has had the same objective over the years while being refined. That is, the final output should represent a comprehensive petrophysical process identifying all potential pay intervals. And those intervals should even include bypassed zones caused by myriad formation-evaluation problems.
As mentioned earlier, not every operator jumped on the bandwagon at the outset because of skepticism about the process and whether it made economic sense in the first place. When bypassed-oil recovery rates had increased total well production “only” to the low-80% recovery range, petrophysicists went back to the drawing board.
One of three most recent refinements credited with boosting production success rates is texturally oriented and uses a pore-size distribution to calculate true textural permeability. This particular advancement of existing technology employs pore-size distribution to calculate true textural permeability by starting with a defined set of conventional log data. By bringing this textural dimension into play, reservoir quality can be fine tuned more than previously.
A second major recent refinement is a well-completion optimization process. It uses key outputs from advanced petrophysical analysis, including permeability, hydrocarbon volume, free fluid, in-situ stress, and rock properties defined at 0.5-ft resolution. It provides specifications that govern a well’s most economic completion, with applications for both new and already-drilled wells. For instance, is the well a refrac candidate, or what about future wells in the field? This process provides a more cost-effective and proactive completion strategy for each reservoir.
Third is a development that takes the textural analysis and key petrophysical outputs and technologically builds a fieldwide 3D presentation. That structural and stratigraphic depiction offers more precise correlation along with better-defined lithologic, stratigraphic, and structural anomalies or discontinuities, as well as better understanding of spatial relationships within a field relative to well and field performance.
Advancements in this and other technologies have improved the capabilities of reservoir characterization, allowing the production of hydrocarbons once left in the ground. Optimizing the production of bypassed pay is a significant chapter among the industry innovations that have taken place in the past decade. And, perhaps just as significantly, this evolution in locating more bypassed pay demonstrates the value of encouraging the type of R&D that goes beyond traditional thinking and cross-pollinates technologies from other industries. While there is nothing wrong with not being an early adopter of new technology, the oil industry is so exceptionally endowed with leading-edge innovators that sticking to the conventional is not necessarily the most profitable path to take. Today’s bypassed pay is where the technology says it is, not where logs only appear to indicate.